No one knows if regulation makes the chemical industry safer
The government spends millions regulating companies that work with large quantities of hazardous substances. But we don’t know whether this is making the industry safer. The number of violations and incidents remains constant. This is the conclusion of external PhD candidate Rob in ’t Veld in his dissertation. He will defend his PhD on 30 March.
Around 400 companies in the Netherlands work with such large quantities of hazardous substances that they could cause a major accident. They must follow the safety measures from the Major Accident (Risks) Decree (Brzo) to protect their employees, local residents and the environment as much as possible. Reports from government regulators show that each year an average of 60 per cent of Brzo companies are found to be in violation of laws and regulations. ‘And the figures are not improving,’ says In ’t Veld.
Same thing year in year out
In ’t Veld analysed reports from regulators (from 2010 to 2021) and interviewed their employees. His most striking conclusion is that nobody knows whether the regulation actually yields results. ‘Each year people dutifully report on how many inspections have been carried out, how many violations there have been and how often enforcement has taken place. The problem is that violations are discovered again a year later and the year after that too. It’s the same thing year in year out. Research also shows that the causes have been the same for years. I predict that the regulators can carry on like this for another 20 years and nothing will have changed.’
In ’t Veld thinks that government should look more closely at what is being achieved with policy, regulation and enforcement. This will give it much more insight into what measures will help make the industry safer. And that is important, he emphasises. ‘There aren’t major incidents at Brzo companies all that often, but when something does go wrong it can disrupt society.’
External PhD candidate Rob In 't Veld
Before he retired, he worked at several organisations in roles relating to safety and working conditions. These roles included as a chief inspector, strategy manager and director of the Major Hazard Control Directorate at the Ministry of Social Affairs and Employment. After he retired, several issues still bothered him, such as inefficiency and fragmentary regulation. He therefore decided to do a PhD – and because it seemed like a fun thing to do.
Text: Dagmar Aarts